yet another al-qaida endorsed terror attack over the weekend. this time in saudi arabia.
these 'holy warriors' don't follow conventions and don't care about soveriegn borders. their goal is simple. disrupt the economy of the world, which hurts everyone, not just americans. i'm wondering how serious the wahabbi saudi royal family is on fighting essentially themselves. i guess we will find out soon enough.
who fears a democratic system in iraq? saudi arabia and iran.
why? both are theocracies ruled by royalty, clerics and mullahs. while there is nothing inherently wrong with that, did i mention that these theocracies reek of corruption? all that money from oil and the people still suffer in poverty
how is it that 3 of 4 'suspects' got away, and they were able to kill 22? i blame the lackluster effort of the saudi special forces with their neat american supplies. perhaps we should train them how to use such things. then again, if they are letting terrorists get away, maybe it's better we don't.
onto other terror stories:
in 2002 off the coast of yemen, some 'terrorists' attacked a french tanker ship, killing 1 person and injuring 12 others. those accused are going on trial in yemen, so rest assured they will be found innocent.
onto domestic legal issues:
scott peterson killed his wife. this is not a spectacular case. loser men kill their pregnant wives all the time in this country. could it be that a ru-486 taken in march of that year would have saved her life? pro-choice for the win.
even though scott peterson killed his wife, lied about it to try to shack up with some trailer trash, he will be found innocent. why? because you take 12 'preselected' and 'qualified' members of anything and get them to agree on something. it can't be done. just another case of our failing justice system. scott goes scott free, that's my prediction.
and then there is this story from the daily bruin about a woman raped in her dorm room by three high schoolers on a field trip.
what is the result? all three got off [literally] the charges because of an indecisive jury. that is, except Deshawn Stringer, who is facing 6 months for grabbing another coed's butt.
how is it that gang rape is less of a crime than 'feeling' someone up? i fail to see the logic.
"Defendants Chuwan Anthony, Jamar Dawson and DeShawn Stringer were found not guilty on charges of collectively contributing to forced rape, oral sex and burglary."
"The jury split evenly 6-6 on Stringer's charge of forced rape, and the jury cast seven votes guilty to five votes not guilty on Stringer's count of forced oral sex. "
"The jury voted 11 votes not guilty to one vote guilty on Dawson and Anthony's charges of forced rape and oral sex. "
hmm... this just doesn't make any sense because:
"After entering several rooms and meeting different people the defendants went to the Fir building where they knocked on the door of "Jane Doe," the name the court is using to protect the woman's identity.
Stringer entered the room and had sex with the woman after Dawson and Anthony left. Earlier in the trial the woman testified she said "no" several times while Stringer forced her to have sex with him.
After Stringer left the room, Dawson and Anthony entered and had oral sex and intercourse with the woman – sometimes concurrently.
The woman testified she did not say "no" or fight back during the sexual encounter with Dawson and Anthony, something the prosecution attributed to "frozen fright."
also take into account that:
[would] a woman would have unprotected sex with three men whom she knew for less than 10 minutes? i think the answer here is no, especially in the middle of a day in a dorm room whilst studying. it doesn't add up. they raped her.
i feel terrible that such acts do not go unpunished. based upon what i know of people with names like Chuwan, Jamar, and DeShawn, is it safe to say these are black men? and since black men get screwed every which way in society and by the justice system, we should understand their sexual prowess and need to sacrifice a coed for their carnal needs. what other explanation is there? surely they did not rape this young woman. i should be a defense lawyer.
then you have the strangest part of the whole story.
"Defense attorneys painted a different picture of the encounter, maintaining the sex had been consensual and that in some cases the woman had implied consent." yeah, and defense attorneys get paid to represent guilty parties most of the time in this country. nothing new here. but from a previous story [link]
During a break in his son's testimony on Wednesday, Robert Dawson, Jamar's father, said he was confident the defendants were going to be acquitted.
"It cost me a lot of money to get the right attorneys for him," Dawson said, adding the entire process has been a hardship for his family.
well blow me down and break the stereotype! now we can't blame the actions on one of these rapists on lack of a father, just a father figure. when scum breeds and makes more scum, we all suffer. am i supposed to feel bad your rapist son forced you to get an attorney to defend him? some father figure you are. maybe he would have been better off if he had no father around.
i'm off to kill someone now, since the likelihood that i get convicted by a jury is a mere 13%. and then these same morons complain about crime on the streets.
pro-choice, pro-death. the pro-life results are displayed above for all to see. there is a solution.
these 'holy warriors' don't follow conventions and don't care about soveriegn borders. their goal is simple. disrupt the economy of the world, which hurts everyone, not just americans. i'm wondering how serious the wahabbi saudi royal family is on fighting essentially themselves. i guess we will find out soon enough.
who fears a democratic system in iraq? saudi arabia and iran.
why? both are theocracies ruled by royalty, clerics and mullahs. while there is nothing inherently wrong with that, did i mention that these theocracies reek of corruption? all that money from oil and the people still suffer in poverty
how is it that 3 of 4 'suspects' got away, and they were able to kill 22? i blame the lackluster effort of the saudi special forces with their neat american supplies. perhaps we should train them how to use such things. then again, if they are letting terrorists get away, maybe it's better we don't.
onto other terror stories:
in 2002 off the coast of yemen, some 'terrorists' attacked a french tanker ship, killing 1 person and injuring 12 others. those accused are going on trial in yemen, so rest assured they will be found innocent.
onto domestic legal issues:
scott peterson killed his wife. this is not a spectacular case. loser men kill their pregnant wives all the time in this country. could it be that a ru-486 taken in march of that year would have saved her life? pro-choice for the win.
even though scott peterson killed his wife, lied about it to try to shack up with some trailer trash, he will be found innocent. why? because you take 12 'preselected' and 'qualified' members of anything and get them to agree on something. it can't be done. just another case of our failing justice system. scott goes scott free, that's my prediction.
and then there is this story from the daily bruin about a woman raped in her dorm room by three high schoolers on a field trip.
what is the result? all three got off [literally] the charges because of an indecisive jury. that is, except Deshawn Stringer, who is facing 6 months for grabbing another coed's butt.
how is it that gang rape is less of a crime than 'feeling' someone up? i fail to see the logic.
"Defendants Chuwan Anthony, Jamar Dawson and DeShawn Stringer were found not guilty on charges of collectively contributing to forced rape, oral sex and burglary."
"The jury split evenly 6-6 on Stringer's charge of forced rape, and the jury cast seven votes guilty to five votes not guilty on Stringer's count of forced oral sex. "
"The jury voted 11 votes not guilty to one vote guilty on Dawson and Anthony's charges of forced rape and oral sex. "
hmm... this just doesn't make any sense because:
"After entering several rooms and meeting different people the defendants went to the Fir building where they knocked on the door of "Jane Doe," the name the court is using to protect the woman's identity.
Stringer entered the room and had sex with the woman after Dawson and Anthony left. Earlier in the trial the woman testified she said "no" several times while Stringer forced her to have sex with him.
After Stringer left the room, Dawson and Anthony entered and had oral sex and intercourse with the woman – sometimes concurrently.
The woman testified she did not say "no" or fight back during the sexual encounter with Dawson and Anthony, something the prosecution attributed to "frozen fright."
also take into account that:
[would] a woman would have unprotected sex with three men whom she knew for less than 10 minutes? i think the answer here is no, especially in the middle of a day in a dorm room whilst studying. it doesn't add up. they raped her.
i feel terrible that such acts do not go unpunished. based upon what i know of people with names like Chuwan, Jamar, and DeShawn, is it safe to say these are black men? and since black men get screwed every which way in society and by the justice system, we should understand their sexual prowess and need to sacrifice a coed for their carnal needs. what other explanation is there? surely they did not rape this young woman. i should be a defense lawyer.
then you have the strangest part of the whole story.
"Defense attorneys painted a different picture of the encounter, maintaining the sex had been consensual and that in some cases the woman had implied consent." yeah, and defense attorneys get paid to represent guilty parties most of the time in this country. nothing new here. but from a previous story [link]
During a break in his son's testimony on Wednesday, Robert Dawson, Jamar's father, said he was confident the defendants were going to be acquitted.
"It cost me a lot of money to get the right attorneys for him," Dawson said, adding the entire process has been a hardship for his family.
well blow me down and break the stereotype! now we can't blame the actions on one of these rapists on lack of a father, just a father figure. when scum breeds and makes more scum, we all suffer. am i supposed to feel bad your rapist son forced you to get an attorney to defend him? some father figure you are. maybe he would have been better off if he had no father around.
i'm off to kill someone now, since the likelihood that i get convicted by a jury is a mere 13%. and then these same morons complain about crime on the streets.
pro-choice, pro-death. the pro-life results are displayed above for all to see. there is a solution.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home